The Truth Behind False Accusations - A Defense of Joe Biden

I am going to address this giant can of worms once then I am going to move on. I don't think I am going to even enable comments on this thread. There is no room for discussion on this. There is very few things that get under my skin than being falsely accused or capitalizing on situations where one can never prove their innocence. Because the entire subject is based on worthless conjecture that is ripe with the ability to confuse people with bias. Lately I have been triggered by people equating unproven out of character accusation to full on, confessed perverted rapist. I am not going to be part of the BS degrading of a man's reputation in this way when there is no evidence he deserves it. This will also be a defense of Joe Biden. If you have something to say, go tell it to somebody else. Settle in, this will be a long one.

Top down response: 

    I am going to tackle this subject by making points about the bigger issues and funneling it down to the point it gets personal. And it does get personal. In some ways it always has. I have always had a weak spot, am easily moved to anger when somebody is wrongly accused. Thought about being a lawyer till they told me I would have to write a lot and go to school for 8 more years. (seems ironic now. Just like the fact I didn't graduate with my class cause I failed government. ) I have always been easily drawn into stories like “The Memphis 3”, Rubin “Hurricane” Carter, and Anthony Porter. “Making of a Murderer” had me from the title. I currently am trying to sneak in when Kristy isn't watching “how to fix a drug deal”. She humors me, like with politics. At least with that, she had warning. One of our first dates, she was dinner with me on Election night 2016, and I couldn't keep my eyes off the TV. I explained that this was “like the Superbowl to me.” (In my defense we were going to “Chuck's Steakhouse” which wasn't. It was a death metal show next to a strip club that may or may not have been defunct. So there was give and take that night.) But I don't think she shares my obsession for these forsaken justices programs. Likewise I have grown equally frustrated with those that have been irrationally acquitted such as Casey Anthony, George Zimmerman, and of course OJ. When I get bored, I watch Criminal minds, Law and order, even Mind Hunters.

    This might shock some of you, but I do not see the world the same way most people do. I focus on different things I can't remember where I put my phone, but I remember where I was when things happened. I knew who Donald Trump was in the 90's. I thought he was a douchebag back then. I worked with ex cons in the factories where I was employed, some of them I grew to believe actually were not guilty. We discussed the “Central Park 5” case back then. I got a real good education.

This is all to say, “justice” matters on this really deep level. The only thing that I am more passionate about is the systemic functions of American politics. And there are “liars” on both sides. There are crimes where the accused are innocent and yet convicted, There are crimes where the accused is guilty but set free. Then there are crimes that just can never be settled. The only people who know what happened were there. There is no way to communicate that in a way that provides clarity. Even more frustrating is the notion that there is two minds, two different perspectives, two truths. Both are right and both are wrong. The only thing you can do is let those cases go. The information can not be used to form an opinion about either person. AND that is the kinds of case the majority of sexual harassment or the like are.

The Big Picture. - Just The Facts.

Fact 1 & 2: People make false accusations and memories are the least dependable evidence.

    The fact is that all kinds of crimes have convictions tied to them that modern techniques have went on to confirm that even though the victim identified their assailant, they were wrong. DNA, fingerprints, or other types of scientific analysis proved their memories deceived them. Elizabath Loftus who studies how we remember events said,

“Our memories are constructive. They're reconstructive. Memory works a little bit more like a Wikipedia page: You can go in there and change it, but so can other people.”

    She has worked with people falsely convinced of every imagination crimes from rape to murder via “eyewitness”. Let that thought marinate in your head dear reader. A mans life was taken from him by a woman who was raped by somebody else, but (often because somebody else with an agenda got in their head) she remembers the most important details completely wrong. She tells a story about a woman going to therapy and believing they had a baby cut out of her. Even thought there was no phsycal evidence that it ever happened. A study published in the BMJ found that 1% of American women reported having birth despite never havingsex. (AKA virgin births)

    When the person with the false memory asks friends about an incident they mentioned once 30 years prior, they are asking the impossible Even in the best of circumstances, human memory is malleable and unreliable. Of the 367 convictions the Innocence Projects has gotten exonerated, a Duke Law School study found that 76% of them were convicted with “eye witness testimony”. So when you have somebody you care about come to you and say, “do you remember when I told you about that incident” your mind wants to tell them “yes”. The only thing we know for sure is that the undeniable truth, is lost at that point.

Here is the problem, there is no taking back the damage that the false accusation, let alone conviction has done. That is why we have an “innocent until proven guilty” in our system.

Fact 3: False allegations of all sexual conducts exist and are common. But how common in difficult to measure.

The very notion of a “False rape accusation” has become taboo. You don't bring it up in this BS age of “Me Too”. Every rape allegation must be true. However, the science says otherwise. The NCBI has posted a study that points out 3 general reason for reporting a false rape. One is for “political gain” or to get attention and “social acceptance from a group. (You know, if your boy Bernie Sanders needs a leg up, you can accuse his competitors of stuff that nobody can prove. But I am getting ahead of myself.)

Reason 1: The Alibi- Where the accuser is caught having sex when they shouldn't be. A cheating wife or a teenager who gets pregnant. (Because saying “God Did It” is a one time deal.)

Reason 2: Revenge- A favorite of divorce posturing and jilted ex lovers throughout the ages. This is why “me too” is so dangerous. It enables this type of motive. Encourages it even.

Reason 3: Quest for sympathy or attention- The NIMH describes this as “an allegation is used to attract sympathy or attention, the rape is usually disclosed to close friends or caregivers and involves unknown perpetrators. “

The report goes on to explain the list is hardly complete or perfect.

 “The list, however, is not exhaustive. For example, the motive of gain is not included in the list. A motive like a promotion to a better job is more a material gain.” 

 The notion of accusing some kind of sexual advance to get revenge for losses of a promotion is clearly in the list.

Fact 4: Crime Or Not Intent Matters.

   In our legal system a crime must be proven by physical evidence, by motive, and by intent. In fact you have to prove intent to prove the motive. The level of intent can determine the level of a crime you are charged with. Vehicular homicide come with way softer punishments than premeditated murder. The same is true in day to day life. You can walk down the street and get angry at everybody who bumps into if you think their intent is one of malice or selfishness. Or you can read body language take the situation in context and / or get an apology and forgive. The notion of saying “I'm sorry” is to convey the intent was not from malice but out of a lack of caution or misunderstanding.

   But intent is something that is lucid and has to be guessed at. Somebody wanting to manipulate the public view of somebody who made a mistake can hold onto the most malice of intent. They can equate them to somebody who clearly has demonstrated near evil level of selfish malice. So often you call these manipulators out on their (B)ernie (S)anders and they scurry backwards saying “No, I am not saying they are the same, just that neither of them are innocent.” BFS. That is the intent, to defile the reputation of a person who is innocent for your one personal settled cognitive dissonance. That is dishonorable

Big Picture Fact 5: Circumstances Can Shine a Light

    In courts it is hard to convict on circumstantial evidence alone. However in the court of public opinion, No such boundaries are set. You can get to know a person through very little information. You are allowed to assume “Facts not in evidence”. So long as you are basing them in factual metrics. This is why our courts do allow “character witnesses”. These are people who don't know the facts of the crime, but they are simply to supply circumstantial context to the “intent” question. Some people find it difficult to make themselves look guilty, and that is unfortunate for them. But guilt is often obvious long before any crime is ever committed.

    All of these elements should not only be considered when sitting in judgment over a court case, but they should also be considered before you go shooting your lying fat mouth of about another man's (or woman's) reputation. If you don't have the doubt minimized and/ or the circumstances identified, then leave that out of your public rantings about a fella.

    One last fact, “investigation” can be used as a weapon. We have a president that demanded an investigation into emails, birth certificates, Burisma and other nonsense that clearly had no grounds. But he says “I don't know. We should have an investigation.” He knows, but the investigation is a way of dragging things on. In fact, this is tRumps primary trick. “investigate the investigators” The hypocrisy of the party who wanted him impeached for it now calling for it in these BS cases.. Again, ahead of myself.

Let's talk about “sex”

    When an act of sex goes down, there are only two people who knows what happened. That even includes if there are more than two people in the room. It is very much an act of intimacy that occurs in the brain. And those two people only know the physical truths of the moment. The both know the sights and and sounds of the environment. They can say whether they saw the other person undress or were undressed. Was it forceful or passionate or somewhere in between. Were there weapons or other means of physical intimidation? Were there sounds? Flirtations, screams, vocalized “no!” There are facts that if there was a recording device it would have captured.

    However, both people are living in their own minds and can not read the others. Just like two people can watch a political speech and “feel” two completely different realities, so it is with a sexual experience. Worse, a person having a pleasant experience but then gets “caught” can have a vivd change in how they remember the incident. This becomes even more so in cases where there was absolutely no sexual interaction, just a perceived “feeling” of sexually related awkwardness. There is no way to tell the intent of the purveyor of this “awkward” behavior. In fact, if you are a follower of Freud, the truth is that the person who felt irrationally “uncomfortable” probably has a repressed incident of actual sexual assault in their history. Freud called this “projection” in which you project feelings onto the wrong person. Often it refers to truths about oneself that one doesn't want to believe or admit to, so they accuse others. But in the “repressed memory” studies, it has been learned that some people, especially children, project previous abuse onto somebody they feel would be less of a threat to report. It is done subconsciously. That means the person actually believes the false memory.

    Another possibility for the “awkward feeling” is not so much “projection” as it is phobic reaction. This was highlighted to me when Dr. Decker (my High School Physics teacher) boiled water in a Bell Jar and asked students to put their finger in the steamy glass of boiling water. Nobody would... Well except me. I reasoned he wouldn't let me hurt myself. It was room temperature. But the rest of the class judged only with their eyes and did not consider the context. The bubbles and steam primed them to not trust a high school teacher. (He was wearing an oven mitt for effect. ) So a person who has been assaulted before may see some likeness to the situation they are in, and are primed to feel “uncomfortable”. A single socially uncommon behavior and a person not in the know, can trigger this defense mechanism. They may never know unless the person says something to them. If this triggers a feeling of even close to sexual connotation in the “me too” environment and everybody is equating him to the Boston Strangler.

The 800 Pound Politicians:

So let us talk about the two politicians that inspired this long post. Including the dishonorable and deplorable accusations being flung around the internet like the shit of ignorant monkeys in a zoo. Equating them is like equating US WWII soldiers with Nazis, saying “well they both killed people”. Or Speeding ticket to murder by saying “Well they both committed crimes.”

It will be easier to outline Joe Biden First. Easier because he didn't do anything to deserves this monkey dung being flung at him. I am just going to describe the accused situations for him. If you want to know more, go look it up. Hopefully get a full context of the account.

Account 1: He “smelled her hair”. That is it. Something that he has done for many years. There is even a collection on camera. This is something very parental.

Account 2: Rubbed noses. Though this one is included, the accuser says, ““It wasn’t sexual.” Yet it is reported as one of the seven. Why prime people with the “sexual” connotations.

Account 3: “Biden rested his hand on her shoulder, and then started to move it down her back.” Again, not a single act that could be seen as “Sexual”.

Account 4: Biden hugged her “just a little bit too long” and laid his hand on her thigh. Did she give him a time limit on the hug? She didn't report what that time frame was. Maybe we need to have this taught to us in school and keep stop watches on us?

Account 5: Biden squeezed her shoulders, complimented her smile, and held her “for a beat too long.” So at least she give a time for the length kind of. A “beat”. How many beats should it be? My beats or the person I am hugging? She went on to say that “her initial reaction was to shrug it off. But she told the Post she now feels the alleged incident was inappropriate” A woman who is literally profiting off of the “me too” movement. What better champion that one who can say she can relate.

Account 6: photographed holding hands and touching foreheads with Biden at the Oscars. The Post first ran the story calling it a “powerful moment” in a very positive way. Not a word about it to anybody until the post reached out to her AFTER the video went viral. Then all the sudden she was, “uncomfortable”. GTFOOH

Account 7: (This one I will put a little time into as it is the only one that NOW has a seal element and is the most focused on now.) “put his hand on my shoulder and run his finger up my neck”. “responsibilities at work were reduced after she refused to serve drinks at an event a task she BELIEVES she was assigned because Biden liked her legs.” So she believes she was limited and now all the sudden it is because of Biden? That ain't flying in court. Where is your proof?” she didn’t feel sexualized by the way she’d been treated, instead saying she felt ornamental, like a lamp. Then in March of this year, after it was evident her favored candidate would lose to Biden, her “memory” and account changed. Then, Account 7, after advocating both for Bernie Sanders vocally as well as Vladimir Putin, she up the allegation from an account of inappropriate touching to sexual assault. She named 5 people who she told, 3 didn't remember, 1 said she mentioned it in passing without details, and the last said she never mentioned the assault part.

However Account 7 fits squarely in the NIML's description of why false accounts are made. She was spited for being let go, she first claimed she left DC to pursue an “acting career”, never once filed a report until she was looking to make a name for herself. No other accounts corroborate such behavior

Every bit of this is BS. There is not one single act of sexual intended behaviors above. Just a bunch of women in the pool of politics that “Believe” stuff.

Circumstantial Evidence.. Or Lack There Of:

Here is the problem with accusing Joe of any sexual impropriety, there is no supporting evidence. None, zero. Zip. There is no reports of he being friends with pedophiles. There is not reports of him even being at parties where there are hookers, let alone hiring one. There are no reports of him making any kind of sexual advance. No text messages, no notes, not filed complaints at work place. Nothing. There is no reports from his children or his wives that he ever cheated on them. He was with his first wife until she dies in a car accident.

Joe Biden married Neilia Hunter in 1966, and they had two sons and a daughter (Naomi Christina). In December 1972, while Joe Biden was Senator-elect, Neilia and Naomi were killed in a traffic crash which injured the two sons, who recovered from their injuries. Joe Biden married his second wife, Jill, in 1977, and together they had a daughter, Ashley. In May 2015, his son Beau died of brain cancer

You assholes who keep spewing shit out your mouth about this guy as if he is some kind of sexual predator are pathetic. I am sorry if you he didn't grow up the exact same way you need to make yourself “feel” comfortable.

Now Let's Talk About the Other Shit Flinging Gorilla:

I couldn't possibly go through all the allegations and confirmation against Donald Trump. I will just hit the highlights. While Biden's accusers most harsh characterization of his actions is “inappropriate touching”, Trump's are listed as “sexual misconduct”. And yet there are people out there with no honor, only disgusting motives of spite cause their candidate lost or a general paranoia that keep putting the two in the same camp to feed some sort of perverted agenda.

Jessica Leeds- He groped her up her skirt on an air flight. Trump didn't deny that he would do something like that, but that she was too ugly for him.

Ivanka Trump - in a sworn deposition “raping her in a fit of rage in 1989 “. “Tearing her clothes and yanking out a chunk of her hair. “Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, argued in 2015 that his client could not have raped Ivana because "you cannot rape your spouse."

Kristin Anderson- “Trump reached under her skirt and touched her vagina through her underwear .” "Okay, Donald is gross. We all know he's gross. Let's just move on."

Jill Harth- “Trump pushed her against a wall, put his hand up her skirt, and tried to kiss her. He was relentless," “Harth sued Trump in 1997 for sexual harassment.” “Trump settled with Houraney, and as a condition of the settlement, Harth withdrew her case.”
Karena Virginia - Trump groped her as she waited for her car outside the US Open she “overheard Trump talking with a group of men about her legs and that Trump then approached her, grabbed her arm, and touched her breast before asking, "Don't you know who I am?"

Natasha Stoynoff "We walked into that room alone, and Trump shut the door behind us. I turned around, and within seconds he was pushing me against the wall and forcing his tongue down my throat,"

Summer Zervos - "He then grabbed my shoulder and began kissing me again very aggressively and placed his hand on my breast," “Zervos sued Trump for defamation after he accused her of lying about the allegations. Trump's attorneys have moved to dismiss the case, arguing that, as president, he can't be sued in state court..”

Katie Johnson- named Trump and billionaire Jeffrey Epstein in a $100 million lawsuit, accusing them of having solicited sex acts from her at sex parties held at the Manhattan homes of Epstein and Trump back in 1994 (when Johnson was just 13 years old). “This week she abruptly canceled a plan to speak publicly about the allegations, and another attorney, Lisa Bloom, cited “numerous threats” against her client.”

That is just a sample of the accusations that rise way above the level of anything Joe has been accused of.

Hardly Circumstantial Against Trump:

Freud Again:

We will start out with The harder one. One sure sign of guilt, one that we see daily out of tRump now, is accusing others of doing the bad things he has done. So it was when he took out 4 full page ads against the Central Park 5. Accusing them of rape and calling for their punishment. THAT is a sociopath crying out for somebody to stop him. At that same moment he was raping 13 yr olds.

Consistency In Accusations:

The same repeated accusations over and over and over explaining the forcible kissing, the grabbing by the pussy, the proclaiming who he is gives him the right. These stories are repeated in different reports like a playbook. This is a technique of cops when interviewing multiple witnesses.  They separate them, then they see which parts of the stories are repeated by different witnesses. These are classified as “credible reports.

Don't Take Their Word For It:

You don't have to take the words of the women alone to prove the case. You have tRump, on multiple occasions, admitting to the facts of the accusations. The “I have to kiss them, I can't help myself.” “I knew she was married, but I didn't care.” Or “They have to let me do it because of who I am”. As well as, “I walk through the dressing rooms while they are naked, I have to see the merchandise.” His utter lack of acceptance or expressed sorrow is classic signs of guilt according to Pamela Myers, the “lie Spotter”. Liars will distance themselves from the lie, “I did not have sexual relations with THAT woman.” So it is with the denials and forgetting who they are.

Poor Character Witness:

Since being president, we have learned that his social circle included the world's most famous pedophile. For whom Trump called “ Terrific guy” who “likes younger women just like I do.” WE have learned that he had sex with a porn star while his youngest son was at home only days old. The exact opposite of being “parental”. We have learned he carried on a lengthy affair with another porn star while married to current wife. He paid her off, and then lied about it. His current wife is a victim of “sex trafficking” as defined by the UN. He is a man who made his career out of pedaling young girls and women in the form of “beauty pageants”

Let's get personal.

You see these as Equals?:

So if you can take these two people and equate them? You are twisted, messed up in the head. Something is wrong with you. I don't think I could trust somebody who sees these two people the same. Why? Because I fear people with inadequate critical thinking skills to delineate. How do I know that I won't be the sources of your confusion. There is no doubt I am socially awkward. At some point in time you are apt to misread my intentions and transfer your own angst or frustration onto me. Then justify some messed up response. My whole life people see me as being a drug addict. They call me cave man in an attempt to diminish my intelligence. It has cost me a lot to be me. The worst was losing my daughter. The only excuse given we that I was considering home schooling and the judge found that more dangerous than my ex who had assaulted me in front of the police while drunk and high. Not a false memory is when the neighbor, (A good wholesome church going lady) saw me walking my daughter. She thought she was complimenting me when she said, “I would never have guessed you would be such a great father.” Was I walked down the street with my dog and baby in her papoose. I know what it means when people say those little mischaracterizations to tear somebody down just to make themselves feel better. 

I see Me:

    Here is the rest of the story about my infatuation with the injustice that happened in the CP5 or Memphis 3 or Seven Avery cases. I can see what happened to them, having happened to me at time. In fact it almost has, and it still haunts my progress at work. Shoot the Memphis 3? I could easily see something like that going down in low income housing development I hung out at back high school. Me, Potter, Helwig, or the like of us being the focus of a small town witch hunt. We didn't go to that school that saw between two districts, nobody knew us. We were often intoxicated. Those guys more than. Sitting around listening to our “devil music”. We even had a couple of mentally deficient friends that would have rolled like logs if they were pressured. Just like all those stories of false accusations. 

    The point of all this.. is to say “fuck off” projecting your sick twisted asses onto me. I am not you. I do things differently. It creeps people out at times I am sure of it. But that is no reason to equate me to some kind of heinous deviant that most of you all must be harboring deep down in your subconscious icebergs. The same is true with your accepting the weak assed case against Joe Biden as if it is gospel. Ain't no way that if you were in Joe's shoes (and believe me, everybody who has been didn't think it could happen to them either) you would be angry with the elaboration of the situation to be equal to the scumbag in chief. 

The Word “Uncomfortable”:

I have recently become far too familiar with this word “uncomfortable”. I have been having issues for about a year with my daughter. Just pulling away. There is a bevy of issues, both physical and emotional that could be at the root of this. She is just entering teen years. Lots of changes out of her control. The issues have lead to her not wanting to be around me or anyone form this side of her world. Pushing back I got from her mother that she said she was “uncomfortable at my house”. That sent up alarms in emergency fashion. I know what the word “uncomfortable” can mean in the minds of complete morons with an agenda. I never heard it, might have been that my ex planted the word in her head. There is evidence something had been planted. She accused me of “not being there”, which makes no sense. Those that know me know my entire life, every decision starts out with “How will this effect my daughter.” I have never missed a weekend, and just before all this had negotiated to having her come around more often. Talking to a counselor myself, she was taken back by the fact she was treating another girl who said the exact same words almost verbatim and from my daughters school. False memories? Very much. The source I don't know. I asked the ex “what does she mean by that.” To which my ex didn't see fit to press my daughter on this. Sadly, she won't talk about the statement to me. So on to counseling it has been. STILL no answer on what that was about. I have come to know that word has seedy underhanded connotations that allow the person who says it to get attention in today's society. They can test the waters without actually committing making a full blown accusation that will have to be defended. They are being conditioned in school today that “nobody can question your feelings”. Which is fine, unless those “feelings” are meant to manipulate slowly an opinion by first painting a backdrop of suspicion around somebody and then letting people see what they want to see.

You Don't Know Me, You Don't Know Joe:

 

     So yeah, Joe Biden. I don't know who he is as a man. If you are reading this, neither do you. Seems straight up. I don't like many liberal democratic policies. But there hasn't been a conservative who represented my views, probably since Ross Perot. What I do know about his personal life is that he is a man who never got suspected of cheating on his wife, never a single accusation of hookers or sexual impropriety. Integrity. Honesty. Strong work ethics. Shows up to work even on the hard days. Has kids he cares about, even one that has some issue. That kid watched his mother and sister die in the car accident he survived. Nobody ever said he didn't keep his promises. So you can hate him for his policy beliefs. (I do, but we have bigger dragons to slay.) You can disagree how far left or moderate he should be on the campaign trail. But you can't compare him to that criminal that resides in the White House. That asshole should be in jail for numerous things, rape is not the least of them. Instead “we the people” elected him and look past his blatant vial behavior and even equate it to honest men. Joe was vice president of the US. You don't think if he was that kind of degenerate he wouldn't have used his power to get his jolly's? He didn't. So just freaking stop it. Or move along.